Skip to main content

Team Happiness metric




My excellent colleague Glenn and I were exchanging some jokey emails earlier in the year about team happiness. We had asked our teams (we both have several agile teams) to collect their own rating of team happiness on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the most happy you could be - at their team retrospectives every iteration.

We exchanged the results. Our comparison went something like this simulation:

Glenn’s Team 1 – Iteration 1 – 3.2, Iteration 2 – 3.3, Iteration 3 – 3.5
Glenn’s Team 2 - Iteration 1 – 3.4, Iteration 2 – 3.5, Iteration 3 – 4.1

Alex’s Team 3 - Iteration 1 – 4, Iteration 2 – 3.5, Iteration 3 – 4
Alex’s Team 4 - Iteration 1 – 3, Iteration 2 – 3.1, Iteration 3 – 3.2

I joked about getting competitive, i.e. could my teams’ happiness beat his teams’ happiness rating?

He retorted that he could give me a team score from our inherited waterfall project team:

Waterfall Team - Iteration 1 – 0, Iteration 2 – 0, Iteration 3 – 0

Poor team! It was not going well for this team, they had a fixed date, a fixed scope and a fixed budget (of course) and no way to accommodate discovered scope (of course) and new scope was being discovered fast.  

At the time our sarcastic emails made me smile, but actually something worse than our imagined team happiness score for this waterfall team was, the actual score should have been represented like this:

Waterfall Team – ?

This team was not tracking their happiness each iteration, they weren’t using iterations let alone retrospectives. There wasn’t an opportunity for team reflection, let alone the team agreeing their happiness rating. We assumed it was zero but in fact we just did not know.

A few months later we were visited by the impressive speaker and coach Bernd Schiffer. During an engaging conversation about leadership and culture he asked me – ‘How do you measure leadership and culture?’ It threw me for a second then I remembered Glenn and I joking about team happiness scores. My answer is that if you can’t even produce something that looks like a team happiness score, i.e. you aren’t even bothering to ask if teams are happy and satisfied in their daily work, that in itself is a measure. I.e. measure culture by asking the question, ‘Do you measure team happiness?’

This missing metric can tell you so much.

Comments

Bernd Schiffer said…
Thanks for the nice words, Alex. Good post where you describe the (obvious) benefits of being able to do iterations, like having a simple (well, if you do iterations) metric like a happiness index.

Btw, you might be interested in the approach I wrote down here: How to Track the Team’s Mood with a Niko-niko Calendar It's a description of tracking happiness on a daily basis, which could give you and your team even more insights.

But hey, you and your team are already doing so much better than a lot of teams I know of, who don't care about their happiness at all. Congrats to you and your team!

Popular posts from this blog

Business Requirement Documents are just no good and should be abolished from the world of creating software

I had hoped the world could have wholeheartedly rejected Business Requirement documents by now. For too long I’ve seen the repeated scenario of only commencing the creation of a new initiative with a requirements document.Unfortunately most organisations that have teams developing software still use these flawed anathemas to creativity as the status quo. Despite agile approaches maturing and customer-centric modes of design emerging, requirements documents still persist. 
If you work in an organisation that doesn’t use business requirement documents any more, read no further. You are lucky; sense has prevailed at your place however in my experience, you are still the minority.
Let's face it; addressing this issue is not always the point you want to start your improvement work when there's much that could be dysfunctional with how a team is delivering software. But now, I find myself as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take business requirement documents anymore. I want to …

My take on SAFe - Scaled Agile Framework for the Enterprise

Something I’ve observed recently amongst this agile/lean/start up/digitally disrupted community that I’m in, is there are a lot of‘SAFe haters’ dissing on SAFe out there.
Well I’ve just come from a giant organisation that is actually making a good fist of ‘doing SAFe’, so I feel like I’ve got an experienced based perspective on SAFe which might be of interest to some.
I’ve been chatting to people on this topic, it astonishes me the amount of opinion that is being shared on SAFe. The criticism and the eye rolling and statements about what it is and isn’t. There’s a growing anticipation over how it will be received and perceived at up coming Lean and Agile conferences, the sense of controversy is palpable. I’ve been soul searching over my own recent experiences. Digested into one sentence my opinion is: “SAFe – it ain’t so bad, but it’s not the answer either.”
So, in what ways do I thinkSAFe is good and can help?
Lining up iterations amongst several teams.
I’ve observed and executed a few…

Gamify your children

Inspired by James Ross’s LAST conference talk on The Shamification of Lamification and the Reclaimification of Gamification I was motivated to try and “Gamify” the school holidays for my three children, Leo aged 8, Chloe 9 and Max 10.
Buy-in is everything, so the first thing we did was a quick workshop to extract the kids ideas. I asked them to write their ideas for good rewards on sticky notes, with a few examples for context, such as ‘trip to the movies or ‘play date with a friend’ . They had 5 minutes to come up with their ideas – one idea per sticky note (as always).
They then read out their ideas for all of us to hear, there were a few duplicates and also a few comedy suggestions. Even though we had ruled out crazy stuff, such as rewards of a million dollars, Leo had written down ‘A unicorn for the back yard’ reading it out with gleeful giggles.
Then they spent 5 minutes writing down tasks that they could do to earn rewards. By now they had the hang of it and quickly came up with t…