Skip to main content

Agile Australia 2011 Series - Prioritisation


Prioritise everything you do. Accept that there’s not going to be enough time to do everything you want to do. Simple.

Think about the prioritisation choices you have made today in selecting what you worked on, what you logged onto, what you decided to read. In my job and in my personal life I prioritise all the time in order to get through the work and living I need to get done. I prioritise my children’s food and ask myself if they have eaten healthily enough to give them a treat after dinner, I think about what family and friends I want to catch up with on the weekend and I organise my priorities to include exercise. It’s this very human characteristic of making fast choices of priority without the complete picture of information to hand, that makes Agile such a comfortable and easy fit for people when it comes to building software.

When we apply prioritisation in agile projects we need to be ruthless; time is money and we can’t do everything. If we needed to complete everything in our busy days as humans we never sleep, so we start with the things that return the most value back to us.

In a similar way prioritising the scope of a project in order of most important first will return us a better value back to us, and an agile approach gives us the appealing ability to commence the realisation of that benefit earlier.

On projects, banish the ‘it’s all must have’ conversation. Really, I mean tackle that conversation early and often. This is a great way of getting customer & stakeholder engagement on your projects as they will soon see how important it is to be in the room when prioritisation calls are happening.

I believe it’s also important to be very disciplined about the ‘So that’...part of the story. In the familiar “As an X, I want Y so that Z” syntax, “So that Z” represents the value of what you are delivering. If as a collective group we are seeing everything as ‘Must Have’ the following questions can be very helpful

  1. Which business objective does this story directly add to? What would be impacted?
  2. Does it make any money for our organisation?
  3. Can we go live without this?

Clarify your thinking around these questions; as a group as it’s easy to have empathy with the situation of the customer, when the right thing to do is make better decisions for our organisations. It’s easy to accept a baseline of MUSTS that isn’t real. I encourage you to challenge that behaviour often.

Outside of project work, I have found quadrants very effective in helping to prioritise what we need to do next at a department level. There’s something comforting about listing your idea for change even if it never makes it to the table for consideration. Quadrants are great for giving us a clear idea of where we can start – the magic “sweet spot” quadrant of high value/ low effort, and quadrants are also good for helping us feel better about not starting certain things in the nasty high effort/ low value quadrant.

Prioritisation is not exclusively a practice or principle of Agile – you don’t need to be an ‘agile IT department’ to be making prioritisation choices, but agile practices and techniques will make aggressive prioritisation much easier. A word of caution: if you are not an ‘agile IT department’ and prioritisation is never coming up as a topic in your organisation, you are building too much into your software.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Business Requirement Documents are just no good and should be abolished from the world of creating software

I had hoped the world could have wholeheartedly rejected Business Requirement documents by now. For too long I’ve seen the repeated scenario of only commencing the creation of a new initiative with a requirements document.Unfortunately most organisations that have teams developing software still use these flawed anathemas to creativity as the status quo. Despite agile approaches maturing and customer-centric modes of design emerging, requirements documents still persist. 
If you work in an organisation that doesn’t use business requirement documents any more, read no further. You are lucky; sense has prevailed at your place however in my experience, you are still the minority.
Let's face it; addressing this issue is not always the point you want to start your improvement work when there's much that could be dysfunctional with how a team is delivering software. But now, I find myself as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take business requirement documents anymore. I want to …

My take on SAFe - Scaled Agile Framework for the Enterprise

Something I’ve observed recently amongst this agile/lean/start up/digitally disrupted community that I’m in, is there are a lot of‘SAFe haters’ dissing on SAFe out there.
Well I’ve just come from a giant organisation that is actually making a good fist of ‘doing SAFe’, so I feel like I’ve got an experienced based perspective on SAFe which might be of interest to some.
I’ve been chatting to people on this topic, it astonishes me the amount of opinion that is being shared on SAFe. The criticism and the eye rolling and statements about what it is and isn’t. There’s a growing anticipation over how it will be received and perceived at up coming Lean and Agile conferences, the sense of controversy is palpable. I’ve been soul searching over my own recent experiences. Digested into one sentence my opinion is: “SAFe – it ain’t so bad, but it’s not the answer either.”
So, in what ways do I thinkSAFe is good and can help?
Lining up iterations amongst several teams.
I’ve observed and executed a few…

Gamify your children

Inspired by James Ross’s LAST conference talk on The Shamification of Lamification and the Reclaimification of Gamification I was motivated to try and “Gamify” the school holidays for my three children, Leo aged 8, Chloe 9 and Max 10.
Buy-in is everything, so the first thing we did was a quick workshop to extract the kids ideas. I asked them to write their ideas for good rewards on sticky notes, with a few examples for context, such as ‘trip to the movies or ‘play date with a friend’ . They had 5 minutes to come up with their ideas – one idea per sticky note (as always).
They then read out their ideas for all of us to hear, there were a few duplicates and also a few comedy suggestions. Even though we had ruled out crazy stuff, such as rewards of a million dollars, Leo had written down ‘A unicorn for the back yard’ reading it out with gleeful giggles.
Then they spent 5 minutes writing down tasks that they could do to earn rewards. By now they had the hang of it and quickly came up with t…