Skip to main content

Agile Australia 2011 Series - Agile Repository


Creating an agile repository is pretty cheap and reasonably easy. This is not for managing your individual project, rather it's purpose is for communicating ‘The Topic of Agile in General'.


Why should you have an repository for agile Information as part of your Agile Transformation? I think a killer reason to have an agile repository is to refute any accusations you may attract that Agile means ‘no documentation’. This is a very common criticism leveled at Agile Methodologies and is simply not fact. Having a response to this with a simple statement “We have documentation! We have a repository!” will put paid to that distracting blocker.


We got this started up pretty early on our agile journey and created an outline of topics we wanted in it. The high level topics on our agile repository are principles and practices. We prioritise them against what we believe are MUSTs SHOULDs or COULDs of our process. i.e. we give an indication of what we MUST do on agile projects as oppose to things we would like to try. In this way we can demonstrate we have a documented process for our Agile projects. A beautiful side effect of prioritising is you can chose to create content in priority order. You can write up your ‘MUST’ content first.


It’s contained in a wiki which makes it very easy to start and conducive to getting people (hopefully friends in your Agile Interest Group) to hop on and create content for it. We use T-wiki – it’s open source, you just need to befriend a technical person to set it up for you, you can make it part of your ‘production stack’ and get it backed up and so on.


It’s an excellent tool for starting your agile transformation. You can use it for educating people, or shutting down unconstructive conversations. It will save you handover time when new people join your agile department.


At the stage we are at now, it’s really not something we rely on heavily, but in the early days when we were trying to win the hearts and minds, and spread the word we relied on it quite a bit. I don’t believe many bureaucrats took the time to navigate all the pages and learn all about Agile, but the fact that it existed seemed enough to satisfy them.


It serves a good purpose as a communication tool, but generally I find it’s more for people outside the project than inside. Projects build up their own collection of artifacts that are important enablers to achieving their

work. An Agile repository can unify people across many projects on the topic of how we work.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Business Requirement Documents are just no good and should be abolished from the world of creating software

I had hoped the world could have wholeheartedly rejected Business Requirement documents by now. For too long I’ve seen the repeated scenario of only commencing the creation of a new initiative with a requirements document.Unfortunately most organisations that have teams developing software still use these flawed anathemas to creativity as the status quo. Despite agile approaches maturing and customer-centric modes of design emerging, requirements documents still persist. 
If you work in an organisation that doesn’t use business requirement documents any more, read no further. You are lucky; sense has prevailed at your place however in my experience, you are still the minority.
Let's face it; addressing this issue is not always the point you want to start your improvement work when there's much that could be dysfunctional with how a team is delivering software. But now, I find myself as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take business requirement documents anymore. I want to …

My take on SAFe - Scaled Agile Framework for the Enterprise

Something I’ve observed recently amongst this agile/lean/start up/digitally disrupted community that I’m in, is there are a lot of‘SAFe haters’ dissing on SAFe out there.
Well I’ve just come from a giant organisation that is actually making a good fist of ‘doing SAFe’, so I feel like I’ve got an experienced based perspective on SAFe which might be of interest to some.
I’ve been chatting to people on this topic, it astonishes me the amount of opinion that is being shared on SAFe. The criticism and the eye rolling and statements about what it is and isn’t. There’s a growing anticipation over how it will be received and perceived at up coming Lean and Agile conferences, the sense of controversy is palpable. I’ve been soul searching over my own recent experiences. Digested into one sentence my opinion is: “SAFe – it ain’t so bad, but it’s not the answer either.”
So, in what ways do I thinkSAFe is good and can help?
Lining up iterations amongst several teams.
I’ve observed and executed a few…

Gamify your children

Inspired by James Ross’s LAST conference talk on The Shamification of Lamification and the Reclaimification of Gamification I was motivated to try and “Gamify” the school holidays for my three children, Leo aged 8, Chloe 9 and Max 10.
Buy-in is everything, so the first thing we did was a quick workshop to extract the kids ideas. I asked them to write their ideas for good rewards on sticky notes, with a few examples for context, such as ‘trip to the movies or ‘play date with a friend’ . They had 5 minutes to come up with their ideas – one idea per sticky note (as always).
They then read out their ideas for all of us to hear, there were a few duplicates and also a few comedy suggestions. Even though we had ruled out crazy stuff, such as rewards of a million dollars, Leo had written down ‘A unicorn for the back yard’ reading it out with gleeful giggles.
Then they spent 5 minutes writing down tasks that they could do to earn rewards. By now they had the hang of it and quickly came up with t…